Jump to content

Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know


Wyrd

Recommended Posts

This is interesting

 

NaturalNews.com printable article

Originally published October 19 2008

 

Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion)

by Mike Adams (see all articles by this author)

 

(NaturalNews) With Breast Cancer Awareness month fully upon us once again, retail stores have been invaded with everything pink, including "pink ribbon" candies and personal care products made with blatantly cancer-causing ingredients. Retail grocery stores like Safeway even hit up customers for donations at the cash register, promising to raise funds to find "the cure for cancer."

 

Consumers of course, have virtually no idea where the funds they donate actually go, nor do they know the truths about breast cancer they'll never be told by conventional cancer non-profit organizations. In this article, I'll reveal ten important myths about breast cancer, and the truths that can save your life.

 

Myth #1: Breast Cancer is not preventable

 

The Truth: Up to 98% of breast cancer cases can be prevented through diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

 

It's true: Breast cancer can be almost entirely prevented through commonsense changes in diet, the addition of anti-cancer nutritional supplements, boosting vitamin D creation from sunlight, avoiding exposure to toxic chemicals in consumer products, pursuing regular exercise and eating a live foods diet.

 

The breast cancer industry -- which depends on the continuation of cancer for its profits and employment -- has so far refused to teach women even basic cancer prevention strategies (such as increasing the intake of vitamin D, which prevents 77% of all cancers). See: http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html

 

Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.

 

The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

 

You know where all that money goes that you donate to the "search for the cure" and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it.

 

Those funds actually go to recruiting breast cancer patients by offering "free" mammograms. This is the clever recruitment strategy of the cancer industry. It's sort of like a greasy garage mechanic offering a "free" checkup on your car's transmission. It's in his financial interest to find something wrong (or to break something), just like it's in the financial interests of the cancer industry to diagnose a women with cancer and scare her into expensive, high-profit treatments like chemotherapy, radiation therapy or cancer surgery. (Mammogram false positives are commonplace...)

 

Want proof of where these funds go? Check out this grant list at the Komen for the Cure organization, and you'll see it's almost entirely spent on recruiting more women with mammograms: http://www.komenphoenix.org/site/c.nsKZ...

 

When you read that list, note that there is not a single grant provided for nutritional education to teach women how to prevent cancer with vitamin D, cruciferous vegetables, anti-cancer herbs, supplements or to avoid dangerous cancer-causing food ingredients like sodium nitrite, MSG and chemical sweeteners.

 

Myth #3: The only proven treatments for breast cancer are chemotherapy and radiation

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy doesn't work and radiation causes cancer

 

Chemotherapy is a fraud, plain and simple. It's as ludicrous as poisoning patients with mercury and calling it medicine (which is something doctors did a hundred years ago, by the way). There is absolutely no reliable scientific evidence showing that chemotherapy has any positive effect whatsoever on breast cancer. Try to find the science yourself: It doesn't exist!

 

Sure, there's evidence that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. Too bad, however, that tumor size is irrelevant. Artificially reducing the size of a tumor does nothing to reverse the physiology of cancer in a patient's body. It doesn't initiate the healing that needs to take place to reverse cancer and stay cancer free. And this doesn't even take into account the quality of life issues here: Chemotherapy doesn't help people LIVE any longer, but it sure does make them DIE longer!

 

Myth #4: Chemotherapy is safe and doesn't cause permanent damage to your health

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy causes vomiting, hair loss, muscle loss, brain damage, heart damage, kidney damage and liver damage. Much of this damage is permanent. Read these stories to learn more:

 

Cancer Drug Causes Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/024475.html

 

Chemotherapy Causes Brain Shrinkage

http://www.naturalnews.com/021200.html

 

Chemotherapy Found to Cause Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html

 

Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

 

The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help

 

Here's part of a story we published in 2006, called Breast Cancer Screening Harms Ten Women for Every One That it Helps (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html)

 

"A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Denmark found that mammograms may harm ten times as many women as they help.

 

The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of seven breast cancer screening programs on 500,000 women in the United States, Canada, Scotland and Sweden. The study's authors found that for every 2,000 women who received mammograms over a 10-year period, only one would have her life prolonged, but 10 would endure unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments."

 

Got that? For every 2,000 women receiving mammograms, only ONE would have her life extended at all. TEN women, though, would be harmed with chemotherapy, radiation or mastectomies.

 

What the study didn't point out, by the way, is that all these treatments are highly profitable for the cancer industry. That's the real reason why mammograms are pushed so aggressively onto women. It's not because mammograms detect cancer; it's because mammograms make them money.

 

To the breast cancer industry, a woman is nothing more than a piece of meat with a cash reward attached to it. The push for mammography is a marketing ploy designed to keep women scared, misinformed and lined up to be poisoned with chemotherapy while they shell out their life savings for treatments that, for most of them, aren't even medically justified!

 

That's why I say the breast cancer industry is, by any honest assessment, a crime against women. In America, husbands who beat their wives are considered criminals. They're arrested and locked away. But those very same men, when wearing a doctor's coat, can assault women with chemicals, slice off their breasts with scalpels and even kill those women... all with impunity. There's not a single breast cancer doctor who has ever been arrested for the death of a patient.

 

The true history of western medicine's violence against women

In time, of course, this will change. Medical violence against women is a crime, regardless of whether the weapon is a fist, a baseball bat or a syringe full of chemicals that will cause permanent damage to her vital organs. In time, chemotherapy will be outlawed and breast cancer doctors will be put out of work or prosecuted for their crimes against women. Perhaps they'll even be castrated as part of a "fitting" punishment.

 

To all the women reading this, note carefully the history of western medicine and its numerous assaults on women over the years. Do you know where the term "hysterectomy" comes from? It comes from the belief by male doctors that women's emotions were "hysterical," and they believed the best way to "cure" women of their hysteria was to violently cut her reproductive organs out of her body.

 

The procedure was widely adopted by male surgeons and used for well over a hundred years to treat women who were diagnosed as suffering from virtually every kind of emotional variance you can imagine. Doctors who didn't use scalpels to remove these organs from a woman's body often resorted to so-called "pelvic massages" -- a medicalized raping of the female patient by the male doctor, of course.

 

Even today, tens of thousands of hysterectomies are performed each year with no medical justification whatsoever. Doctors continue to view women's bodies as diseased and abnormal, surgically removing their breasts and reproductive organs for no justifiable reason whatsoever. It's even being done today as a cancer prevention procedure, against women who have no cancer at all!

 

Western medicine's treatment of breast cancer patients today is little more than an extension of hundreds of years of medical violence against women by the male-dominated medical establishment.

 

Want proof? Notice that cancer doctors never advise men to surgically remove their testicles as a way to "prevent" testicular cancer? That's because the male surgeons performing these operations prefer to maim women, not men.

 

If you have the stomach for it, read the rest of the truth about how conventional doctors and surgeons commit outrageous medical violence against women and children even today: http://www.naturalnews.com/019930.html

 

Myth #6: BRCA-positive women should consider mastectomies to prevent cancer

 

The Truth: Cruciferous vegetables target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, preventing cancer with nutrition

 

Women who are BRCA positive are being scared into utterly unnecessary double mastectomies -- a procedure that benefits no one except the surgeon. What nobody is telling these women is that cruciferous vegetables contain anti-cancer nutrients that specifically target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, protecting these women from breast cancer.

 

All it takes is a single ounce of fresh broccoli juice each day, or fresh sprouts, superfoods or other nutrient-dense foods or juices consumed daily.

 

Cancer doctors, of course, conveniently forget to tell women about these little facts. It would hurt their business if women knew how to prevent cancer on their own, at home, with everyday groceries and simple herbs.

 

Here's text from one study that might interest you. It shows that I3C (from broccoli) and genistein (from fermented soy) inhibit estrogen-stimulated receptor activity in a dose-dependent fashion:

 

"...we showed that I3C induces BRCA1 expression and that both I3C and BRCA1 inhibit oestrogen (E2)-stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER-) activity in human breast cancer cells. We now report that both I3C and genistein induce the expression of both breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in breast (MCF-7 and T47D) and prostate (DU-145 and LNCaP) cancer cell types, in a time- and dose-dependent fashion.

 

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n...

 

Conventional cancer doctors, of course, refuse to tell women about scientific evidence like this. If women could prevent breast cancer with I3C, why would they need cancer doctors? The answer, of course, is that they wouldn't. You can buy I3C, but the way, right here: http://www.vitacost.com/NSI-I3C-Indole-...

 

The FDA, of course, won't allow companies selling I3C supplements to tell you the scientifically-validated truth about their anti-cancer benefits. It's all part of the censorship and oppression that characterizes today's cancer industry. The U.S. government, of course, is the co-conspirator in this sad tragedy of misinformation.

 

It is the job of the FDA and the cancer industry to keep women stupid, uninformed and scared when it comes to breast cancer. The last thing they want is for women to be nutritionally literate.

 

Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer

 

The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry

 

It's the great scam of the cancer industry: We're searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they've been using this same con since the late 60's, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.

 

The search for "the cure" is pure deception. It's a clever con to take money from people for all those silly pink ribbon activities, but the truth is that the cancer industry doesn't believe there's such a thing as cure. Just ask the FDA, the AMA or any state health licensing board: Anyone claiming to have a cancer "cure" is immediately considered a quack. Over the last several decades, countless doctors researching genuine cancer cures have been arrested, imprisoned or run out of the country. Read about Stanislaw Burzynski to learn about just one example: http://www.cancure.org/burzynski_instit...

 

Finally, even if they actually find a "cure" (which they won't, since that would destroy the profits of the cancer industry), do you think they would give it away for free? Of course not! They'd charge hundreds of thousands of dollars for it, milking the maximum profits out of a terrified population for their newest wonder drug.

 

Notice, by the way, that not a single conventional breast cancer non-profit group -- nor any drug company -- has announced that its breakthrough cancer drugs will be given away for free. And that leads me to this question: If they're not planning on giving away the cure for free, then why are you giving them money for free to pay for their R&D?

 

Why should people donate money to the wealthiest corporations in the world (the drug companies) who are going to take their money and use it to develop a new wave of drugs that are sold to cancer victims at outrageous price markups sometimes exceeding 550,000% of the cost of the chemical ingredients?

 

The truth is, anyone who donates money for any such "search for the cure" is being conned outright. There's a sucker born every minute, P.T. Barnum famously said. What he neglected to add is that most of them are now buying pink products and thinking they're helping find a "cure" for cancer.

 

Don't be suckered. Keep your money, or invest it in vitamin D supplements or anti-cancer herbs. You want to cure cancer? Cure it in your own body first. It's a lot less expensive, and you get to keep your hair, too.

 

Myth #8: There is no cure for breast cancer

 

The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for breast cancer available right now

 

Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for cancer: Vitamin D, cat's claw herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal mushrooms, spirulina, cruciferous vegetables, green tea, graviola herbs, Chinese medicinal herbs, oxygen therapy, alkalizing water therapies and much more.

 

All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by the FDA and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America.

 

Myth #9: If my mother had breast cancer, I'll get it too

 

The Truth: Breast Cancer is not caused by bad genes; it's caused by bad diets

 

This is another common lie told to woman by cancer doctors to scare them into medically unnecessary cancer "treatments" (which can kill you or harm you). Did you know that radiation treatment for one breast actually causes cancer in the OTHER breast? See: http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000366_...

 

Your genes don't control your health, but what you put in your mouth and on your skin has near-total control over your health! If your parents had cancer, they were no doubt eating cancer-causing foods (processed meats) and not using anti-cancer foods, superfoods, herbs and supplements. They were also likely deficient in vitamin D, and they probably didn't drink fresh anti-cancer vegetables on a daily basis (http://www.JuiceFeasting.com). Lastly, they no doubt had regular exposure to cancer-causing chemicals: Cigarette smoke, chemical solvents, perfume chemicals, household cleaners, pesticides, skin care products, conventional cosmetics, etc.

 

Read the truth about processed meats: http://www.naturalnews.com/022288.html

 

Myth #10: Sunlight causes cancer

 

The Truth: Sunlight generates Vitamin D in your skin, which prevents 78% of ALL cancers

 

The disinformation put out by the cancer industry about sunlight has reached a level of absurdity that's virtually unmatched in the history of medicine. If you believe what the American Cancer Society tells you (still being suckered?), sunlight causes cancer!

 

Yes, that's right: Sunlight causes cancer, they claim. According to the entire cancer industry (and most dermatologists, too), you'd be much better off hiding in a cave, or living your life under fluorescent lights or smothered in a layer of toxic sunscreen chemicals (which actually DO cause cancer, by the way).

 

Somehow, the human race has miraculously managed to survived 350,000 years of natural sunlight without be obliterated. This is nothing short of astonishing, given that sunlight is so deadly. It sort of makes me wonder how the human race survived at all, with sunlight striking any given area of the Earth, say, 50% of the time. Did our ancestors live underground?

 

The ploy here is so obvious that it's child's play to expose their strategy: Cancer industry authorities know that vitamin D prevents 77% of all cancers. Since sunlight exposure causes the skin to generate vitamin D in the human body (for free, no less), the cancer industry has come to the realization that in order for it to continue surviving (and exploiting cancer patients), it has to scare people away from anything that might actually prevent or cure cancer.

 

This is the whole reason behind the sunlight scare campaigns, of course. It's all just a clever profit strategy to keep people sick and diseased by enforcing widespread vitamin D deficiency across the human population. Note, too, that this deficiency is especially prominent in men and women of darker skin color, which means the cancer industry's whole campaign against sunlight is filled with disturbing racial overtones that smack of genocide. (Ever wonder why breast cancer is FAR more aggressive in black women and white women? It's the vitamin D deficiency caused by the skin color, of course. But cancer docs never tell their black patients anything about it...)

 

Remember this: Healthy people with abundant vitamin D levels in their blood don't get cancer and they almost never catch colds. They also don't need vaccines, by the way. These are three huge profit centers for conventional medicine: Cancer, vaccines and colds. This is why the industry goes to such great lengths to (hilariously) try to discredit the sun.

 

It's hilarious because the sun, of course, is the source of ALL life on our planet. Without the sun, there would be no plants, no bacteria, no animals, no fish and certainly no humans. The sun is the single most important source of life on our planet, and without it, we'd all die in a matter of a few hours (from the cold alone). That the cancer industry would declare war on the sun is just a disturbing example of how far removed modern medicine is from the real world.

 

Why the cancer industry is dangerous to women

The cancer industry people are living in a world of self-reinforced fictions, where sunlight is bad and chemotherapy chemicals are good; where food is useless but pharmaceuticals are essential. Almost everything said to you by a conventional cancer doctor is the opposite of what's real, and yet they believe their own delusions only because those delusions are so widely shared by their colleagues. It is circular logic at its worst, driven by arrogance and greed, and totally lacking any discernable degree of intellectual honesty or compassion for the value of a human life.

 

The cancer industry is, in a very real way, a danger to the safety of men and women alike. It is a kind of home-grown medical terrorism, through which the application of fear and disinformation results in massive corporate profits that are only exceeded by the body count of our dead women; our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts and nieces who fall victim to conventional cancer treatments. They are being lost to a medical regime wielding weapons of mass destruction: Chemical weapons (chemotherapy), radiological weapons (radiation) and weapons of sharp steel (scalpels).

 

These weapons of medical violence are being directed at our women for one purpose only: To secure profits that go into the hands of a few wealthy men who sit at the top of these organizations, raking in fifty-million-dollar salaries while the cancer treatment centers send women home in body bags.

 

It is the ultimate act of cruelty to promise a woman "treatment" and then deliver poison.

 

It is the ultimate act of violence to promise a woman "healing" and then mutilate her body.

 

The cancer industry, as operated today, is ultimately a criminal organization engaged in acts of medical violence against women.

 

Why women should revolt against the cancer industry

Even worse, it is being staffed by women, cheered by women and supported by women. In World War II, before the Jews were exterminated, Nazi soldiers pried the gold fillings out of their mouths. The fillings were sold off, and the money went to two places: The pockets of the top Nazi commanders, and the continued funding of the prison camps and extermination chambers. The Jewish prisoners, in other words, paid for their own gas chamber treatments using the gold right out of their own mouths.

 

Today, women are paying for their own cancer industry chemical assaults using the dollars right out of their own pockets. Those who support the conventional breast cancer non-profits are feeding the very beast that may someday destroy them and send them home poisoned, emaciated, or mutilated beyond repair.

 

And you know what the pink ribbon non-profits will do to help these women? WIGS. They'll give them wigs to cover their hairless heads.

 

 

Chemotherapy victim or concentration camp prisoner? They both produce these same results. Zyklon B gas, by the way, was manufactured by a pharmaceutical company.

 

It is no coincidence that women who receive chemotherapy visually resemble the women of the Nazi concentration camps. They become emaciated through dangerous losses of muscle mass and bone mass. They lose their hair, vomit their food and suffer the devastating effects of massive nutrient loss.

 

They are, in effect, both prisoners of the same system of control and violence against women. It is a system that has existed for thousands of years, taking on new names and new faces as it shifts from one corner of the planet to another.

 

Today, that system of abuse and violence against women has a corporate logo, a cute pink symbol and a clever slogan. It has hundreds of offices all across the country, and thousands of pink products in retail stores. It is a system of violence against women, painted pink and repackaged as something that cares for women; and in that disguise, aided by the purchasing dollars of gullible consumers, it is ensnaring women in a system of such great evil that it can only be accurately compared to historical events like the Holocaust.

 

May God save our women from the cancer industry, lest we lose four generations to this modern chemical holocaust that has been unleashed against our mothers, daughters, grandmothers and sisters. And if our government will not protect us from this home-grown terrorism that seeks to turn the bodies of women into corporate profit centers, I hope that the People of America will one day wake up and take all justified (non-violent) measures to protect themselves from the cancer industry.

 

It is odd, I think, that women will protest in front of abortion clinics in order to save the life of an unborn child, and yet that same woman will say nothing when a cancer doctor destroys the life of her own mother or daughter. It is time to start protesting the cancer clinics and cancer non-profits. It is time to end this chemical holocaust and this medical violence against women. The women should be marching against mammograms and chemotherapy, demanding the arrest and prosecution of cancer surgeons who perform unjustified double mastectomies.

 

Throughout history, women have fought hard for the right to vote, to pursue an education and to be heard. I believe it is time that women exercised those rights to protect their freedoms and their lives from the conventional cancer industry.

 

 

 

 

All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit http://www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting

 

NaturalNews.com printable article

Originally published October 19 2008

 

Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion)

by Mike Adams (see all articles by this author)

 

(NaturalNews) With Breast Cancer Awareness month fully upon us once again, retail stores have been invaded with everything pink, including "pink ribbon" candies and personal care products made with blatantly cancer-causing ingredients. Retail grocery stores like Safeway even hit up customers for donations at the cash register, promising to raise funds to find "the cure for cancer."

 

Consumers of course, have virtually no idea where the funds they donate actually go, nor do they know the truths about breast cancer they'll never be told by conventional cancer non-profit organizations. In this article, I'll reveal ten important myths about breast cancer, and the truths that can save your life.

 

Myth #1: Breast Cancer is not preventable

 

The Truth: Up to 98% of breast cancer cases can be prevented through diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

 

It's true: Breast cancer can be almost entirely prevented through commonsense changes in diet, the addition of anti-cancer nutritional supplements, boosting vitamin D creation from sunlight, avoiding exposure to toxic chemicals in consumer products, pursuing regular exercise and eating a live foods diet.

 

The breast cancer industry -- which depends on the continuation of cancer for its profits and employment -- has so far refused to teach women even basic cancer prevention strategies (such as increasing the intake of vitamin D, which prevents 77% of all cancers). See: http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html

 

Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.

 

The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

 

You know where all that money goes that you donate to the "search for the cure" and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it.

 

Those funds actually go to recruiting breast cancer patients by offering "free" mammograms. This is the clever recruitment strategy of the cancer industry. It's sort of like a greasy garage mechanic offering a "free" checkup on your car's transmission. It's in his financial interest to find something wrong (or to break something), just like it's in the financial interests of the cancer industry to diagnose a women with cancer and scare her into expensive, high-profit treatments like chemotherapy, radiation therapy or cancer surgery. (Mammogram false positives are commonplace...)

 

Want proof of where these funds go? Check out this grant list at the Komen for the Cure organization, and you'll see it's almost entirely spent on recruiting more women with mammograms: http://www.komenphoenix.org/site/c.nsKZ...

 

When you read that list, note that there is not a single grant provided for nutritional education to teach women how to prevent cancer with vitamin D, cruciferous vegetables, anti-cancer herbs, supplements or to avoid dangerous cancer-causing food ingredients like sodium nitrite, MSG and chemical sweeteners.

 

Myth #3: The only proven treatments for breast cancer are chemotherapy and radiation

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy doesn't work and radiation causes cancer

 

Chemotherapy is a fraud, plain and simple. It's as ludicrous as poisoning patients with mercury and calling it medicine (which is something doctors did a hundred years ago, by the way). There is absolutely no reliable scientific evidence showing that chemotherapy has any positive effect whatsoever on breast cancer. Try to find the science yourself: It doesn't exist!

 

Sure, there's evidence that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. Too bad, however, that tumor size is irrelevant. Artificially reducing the size of a tumor does nothing to reverse the physiology of cancer in a patient's body. It doesn't initiate the healing that needs to take place to reverse cancer and stay cancer free. And this doesn't even take into account the quality of life issues here: Chemotherapy doesn't help people LIVE any longer, but it sure does make them DIE longer!

 

Myth #4: Chemotherapy is safe and doesn't cause permanent damage to your health

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy causes vomiting, hair loss, muscle loss, brain damage, heart damage, kidney damage and liver damage. Much of this damage is permanent. Read these stories to learn more:

 

Cancer Drug Causes Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/024475.html

 

Chemotherapy Causes Brain Shrinkage

http://www.naturalnews.com/021200.html

 

Chemotherapy Found to Cause Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html

 

Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

 

The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help

 

Here's part of a story we published in 2006, called Breast Cancer Screening Harms Ten Women for Every One That it Helps (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html)

 

"A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Denmark found that mammograms may harm ten times as many women as they help.

 

The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of seven breast cancer screening programs on 500,000 women in the United States, Canada, Scotland and Sweden. The study's authors found that for every 2,000 women who received mammograms over a 10-year period, only one would have her life prolonged, but 10 would endure unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments."

 

Got that? For every 2,000 women receiving mammograms, only ONE would have her life extended at all. TEN women, though, would be harmed with chemotherapy, radiation or mastectomies.

 

What the study didn't point out, by the way, is that all these treatments are highly profitable for the cancer industry. That's the real reason why mammograms are pushed so aggressively onto women. It's not because mammograms detect cancer; it's because mammograms make them money.

 

To the breast cancer industry, a woman is nothing more than a piece of meat with a cash reward attached to it. The push for mammography is a marketing ploy designed to keep women scared, misinformed and lined up to be poisoned with chemotherapy while they shell out their life savings for treatments that, for most of them, aren't even medically justified!

 

That's why I say the breast cancer industry is, by any honest assessment, a crime against women. In America, husbands who beat their wives are considered criminals. They're arrested and locked away. But those very same men, when wearing a doctor's coat, can assault women with chemicals, slice off their breasts with scalpels and even kill those women... all with impunity. There's not a single breast cancer doctor who has ever been arrested for the death of a patient.

 

The true history of western medicine's violence against women

In time, of course, this will change. Medical violence against women is a crime, regardless of whether the weapon is a fist, a baseball bat or a syringe full of chemicals that will cause permanent damage to her vital organs. In time, chemotherapy will be outlawed and breast cancer doctors will be put out of work or prosecuted for their crimes against women. Perhaps they'll even be castrated as part of a "fitting" punishment.

 

To all the women reading this, note carefully the history of western medicine and its numerous assaults on women over the years. Do you know where the term "hysterectomy" comes from? It comes from the belief by male doctors that women's emotions were "hysterical," and they believed the best way to "cure" women of their hysteria was to violently cut her reproductive organs out of her body.

 

The procedure was widely adopted by male surgeons and used for well over a hundred years to treat women who were diagnosed as suffering from virtually every kind of emotional variance you can imagine. Doctors who didn't use scalpels to remove these organs from a woman's body often resorted to so-called "pelvic massages" -- a medicalized raping of the female patient by the male doctor, of course.

 

Even today, tens of thousands of hysterectomies are performed each year with no medical justification whatsoever. Doctors continue to view women's bodies as diseased and abnormal, surgically removing their breasts and reproductive organs for no justifiable reason whatsoever. It's even being done today as a cancer prevention procedure, against women who have no cancer at all!

 

Western medicine's treatment of breast cancer patients today is little more than an extension of hundreds of years of medical violence against women by the male-dominated medical establishment.

 

Want proof? Notice that cancer doctors never advise men to surgically remove their testicles as a way to "prevent" testicular cancer? That's because the male surgeons performing these operations prefer to maim women, not men.

 

If you have the stomach for it, read the rest of the truth about how conventional doctors and surgeons commit outrageous medical violence against women and children even today: http://www.naturalnews.com/019930.html

 

Myth #6: BRCA-positive women should consider mastectomies to prevent cancer

 

The Truth: Cruciferous vegetables target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, preventing cancer with nutrition

 

Women who are BRCA positive are being scared into utterly unnecessary double mastectomies -- a procedure that benefits no one except the surgeon. What nobody is telling these women is that cruciferous vegetables contain anti-cancer nutrients that specifically target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, protecting these women from breast cancer.

 

All it takes is a single ounce of fresh broccoli juice each day, or fresh sprouts, superfoods or other nutrient-dense foods or juices consumed daily.

 

Cancer doctors, of course, conveniently forget to tell women about these little facts. It would hurt their business if women knew how to prevent cancer on their own, at home, with everyday groceries and simple herbs.

 

Here's text from one study that might interest you. It shows that I3C (from broccoli) and genistein (from fermented soy) inhibit estrogen-stimulated receptor activity in a dose-dependent fashion:

 

"...we showed that I3C induces BRCA1 expression and that both I3C and BRCA1 inhibit oestrogen (E2)-stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER-) activity in human breast cancer cells. We now report that both I3C and genistein induce the expression of both breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in breast (MCF-7 and T47D) and prostate (DU-145 and LNCaP) cancer cell types, in a time- and dose-dependent fashion.

 

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n...

 

Conventional cancer doctors, of course, refuse to tell women about scientific evidence like this. If women could prevent breast cancer with I3C, why would they need cancer doctors? The answer, of course, is that they wouldn't. You can buy I3C, but the way, right here: http://www.vitacost.com/NSI-I3C-Indole-...

 

The FDA, of course, won't allow companies selling I3C supplements to tell you the scientifically-validated truth about their anti-cancer benefits. It's all part of the censorship and oppression that characterizes today's cancer industry. The U.S. government, of course, is the co-conspirator in this sad tragedy of misinformation.

 

It is the job of the FDA and the cancer industry to keep women stupid, uninformed and scared when it comes to breast cancer. The last thing they want is for women to be nutritionally literate.

 

Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer

 

The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry

 

It's the great scam of the cancer industry: We're searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they've been using this same con since the late 60's, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.

 

The search for "the cure" is pure deception. It's a clever con to take money from people for all those silly pink ribbon activities, but the truth is that the cancer industry doesn't believe there's such a thing as cure. Just ask the FDA, the AMA or any state health licensing board: Anyone claiming to have a cancer "cure" is immediately considered a quack. Over the last several decades, countless doctors researching genuine cancer cures have been arrested, imprisoned or run out of the country. Read about Stanislaw Burzynski to learn about just one example: http://www.cancure.org/burzynski_instit...

 

Finally, even if they actually find a "cure" (which they won't, since that would destroy the profits of the cancer industry), do you think they would give it away for free? Of course not! They'd charge hundreds of thousands of dollars for it, milking the maximum profits out of a terrified population for their newest wonder drug.

 

Notice, by the way, that not a single conventional breast cancer non-profit group -- nor any drug company -- has announced that its breakthrough cancer drugs will be given away for free. And that leads me to this question: If they're not planning on giving away the cure for free, then why are you giving them money for free to pay for their R&D?

 

Why should people donate money to the wealthiest corporations in the world (the drug companies) who are going to take their money and use it to develop a new wave of drugs that are sold to cancer victims at outrageous price markups sometimes exceeding 550,000% of the cost of the chemical ingredients?

 

The truth is, anyone who donates money for any such "search for the cure" is being conned outright. There's a sucker born every minute, P.T. Barnum famously said. What he neglected to add is that most of them are now buying pink products and thinking they're helping find a "cure" for cancer.

 

Don't be suckered. Keep your money, or invest it in vitamin D supplements or anti-cancer herbs. You want to cure cancer? Cure it in your own body first. It's a lot less expensive, and you get to keep your hair, too.

 

Myth #8: There is no cure for breast cancer

 

The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for breast cancer available right now

 

Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for cancer: Vitamin D, cat's claw herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal mushrooms, spirulina, cruciferous vegetables, green tea, graviola herbs, Chinese medicinal herbs, oxygen therapy, alkalizing water therapies and much more.

 

All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by the FDA and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America.

 

Myth #9: If my mother had breast cancer, I'll get it too

 

The Truth: Breast Cancer is not caused by bad genes; it's caused by bad diets

 

This is another common lie told to woman by cancer doctors to scare them into medically unnecessary cancer "treatments" (which can kill you or harm you). Did you know that radiation treatment for one breast actually causes cancer in the OTHER breast? See: http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000366_...

 

Your genes don't control your health, but what you put in your mouth and on your skin has near-total control over your health! If your parents had cancer, they were no doubt eating cancer-causing foods (processed meats) and not using anti-cancer foods, superfoods, herbs and supplements. They were also likely deficient in vitamin D, and they probably didn't drink fresh anti-cancer vegetables on a daily basis (http://www.JuiceFeasting.com). Lastly, they no doubt had regular exposure to cancer-causing chemicals: Cigarette smoke, chemical solvents, perfume chemicals, household cleaners, pesticides, skin care products, conventional cosmetics, etc.

 

Read the truth about processed meats: http://www.naturalnews.com/022288.html

 

Myth #10: Sunlight causes cancer

 

The Truth: Sunlight generates Vitamin D in your skin, which prevents 78% of ALL cancers

 

The disinformation put out by the cancer industry about sunlight has reached a level of absurdity that's virtually unmatched in the history of medicine. If you believe what the American Cancer Society tells you (still being suckered?), sunlight causes cancer!

 

Yes, that's right: Sunlight causes cancer, they claim. According to the entire cancer industry (and most dermatologists, too), you'd be much better off hiding in a cave, or living your life under fluorescent lights or smothered in a layer of toxic sunscreen chemicals (which actually DO cause cancer, by the way).

 

Somehow, the human race has miraculously managed to survived 350,000 years of natural sunlight without be obliterated. This is nothing short of astonishing, given that sunlight is so deadly. It sort of makes me wonder how the human race survived at all, with sunlight striking any given area of the Earth, say, 50% of the time. Did our ancestors live underground?

 

The ploy here is so obvious that it's child's play to expose their strategy: Cancer industry authorities know that vitamin D prevents 77% of all cancers. Since sunlight exposure causes the skin to generate vitamin D in the human body (for free, no less), the cancer industry has come to the realization that in order for it to continue surviving (and exploiting cancer patients), it has to scare people away from anything that might actually prevent or cure cancer.

 

This is the whole reason behind the sunlight scare campaigns, of course. It's all just a clever profit strategy to keep people sick and diseased by enforcing widespread vitamin D deficiency across the human population. Note, too, that this deficiency is especially prominent in men and women of darker skin color, which means the cancer industry's whole campaign against sunlight is filled with disturbing racial overtones that smack of genocide. (Ever wonder why breast cancer is FAR more aggressive in black women and white women? It's the vitamin D deficiency caused by the skin color, of course. But cancer docs never tell their black patients anything about it...)

 

Remember this: Healthy people with abundant vitamin D levels in their blood don't get cancer and they almost never catch colds. They also don't need vaccines, by the way. These are three huge profit centers for conventional medicine: Cancer, vaccines and colds. This is why the industry goes to such great lengths to (hilariously) try to discredit the sun.

 

It's hilarious because the sun, of course, is the source of ALL life on our planet. Without the sun, there would be no plants, no bacteria, no animals, no fish and certainly no humans. The sun is the single most important source of life on our planet, and without it, we'd all die in a matter of a few hours (from the cold alone). That the cancer industry would declare war on the sun is just a disturbing example of how far removed modern medicine is from the real world.

 

Why the cancer industry is dangerous to women

The cancer industry people are living in a world of self-reinforced fictions, where sunlight is bad and chemotherapy chemicals are good; where food is useless but pharmaceuticals are essential. Almost everything said to you by a conventional cancer doctor is the opposite of what's real, and yet they believe their own delusions only because those delusions are so widely shared by their colleagues. It is circular logic at its worst, driven by arrogance and greed, and totally lacking any discernable degree of intellectual honesty or compassion for the value of a human life.

 

The cancer industry is, in a very real way, a danger to the safety of men and women alike. It is a kind of home-grown medical terrorism, through which the application of fear and disinformation results in massive corporate profits that are only exceeded by the body count of our dead women; our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts and nieces who fall victim to conventional cancer treatments. They are being lost to a medical regime wielding weapons of mass destruction: Chemical weapons (chemotherapy), radiological weapons (radiation) and weapons of sharp steel (scalpels).

 

These weapons of medical violence are being directed at our women for one purpose only: To secure profits that go into the hands of a few wealthy men who sit at the top of these organizations, raking in fifty-million-dollar salaries while the cancer treatment centers send women home in body bags.

 

It is the ultimate act of cruelty to promise a woman "treatment" and then deliver poison.

 

It is the ultimate act of violence to promise a woman "healing" and then mutilate her body.

 

The cancer industry, as operated today, is ultimately a criminal organization engaged in acts of medical violence against women.

 

Why women should revolt against the cancer industry

Even worse, it is being staffed by women, cheered by women and supported by women. In World War II, before the Jews were exterminated, Nazi soldiers pried the gold fillings out of their mouths. The fillings were sold off, and the money went to two places: The pockets of the top Nazi commanders, and the continued funding of the prison camps and extermination chambers. The Jewish prisoners, in other words, paid for their own gas chamber treatments using the gold right out of their own mouths.

 

Today, women are paying for their own cancer industry chemical assaults using the dollars right out of their own pockets. Those who support the conventional breast cancer non-profits are feeding the very beast that may someday destroy them and send them home poisoned, emaciated, or mutilated beyond repair.

 

And you know what the pink ribbon non-profits will do to help these women? WIGS. They'll give them wigs to cover their hairless heads.

 

 

Chemotherapy victim or concentration camp prisoner? They both produce these same results. Zyklon B gas, by the way, was manufactured by a pharmaceutical company.

 

It is no coincidence that women who receive chemotherapy visually resemble the women of the Nazi concentration camps. They become emaciated through dangerous losses of muscle mass and bone mass. They lose their hair, vomit their food and suffer the devastating effects of massive nutrient loss.

 

They are, in effect, both prisoners of the same system of control and violence against women. It is a system that has existed for thousands of years, taking on new names and new faces as it shifts from one corner of the planet to another.

 

Today, that system of abuse and violence against women has a corporate logo, a cute pink symbol and a clever slogan. It has hundreds of offices all across the country, and thousands of pink products in retail stores. It is a system of violence against women, painted pink and repackaged as something that cares for women; and in that disguise, aided by the purchasing dollars of gullible consumers, it is ensnaring women in a system of such great evil that it can only be accurately compared to historical events like the Holocaust.

 

May God save our women from the cancer industry, lest we lose four generations to this modern chemical holocaust that has been unleashed against our mothers, daughters, grandmothers and sisters. And if our government will not protect us from this home-grown terrorism that seeks to turn the bodies of women into corporate profit centers, I hope that the People of America will one day wake up and take all justified (non-violent) measures to protect themselves from the cancer industry.

 

It is odd, I think, that women will protest in front of abortion clinics in order to save the life of an unborn child, and yet that same woman will say nothing when a cancer doctor destroys the life of her own mother or daughter. It is time to start protesting the cancer clinics and cancer non-profits. It is time to end this chemical holocaust and this medical violence against women. The women should be marching against mammograms and chemotherapy, demanding the arrest and prosecution of cancer surgeons who perform unjustified double mastectomies.

 

Throughout history, women have fought hard for the right to vote, to pursue an education and to be heard. I believe it is time that women exercised those rights to protect their freedoms and their lives from the conventional cancer industry.

 

 

 

 

All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit http://www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

 

 

 

 

Russell, I take some very serious issues with this article overall.

 

There are a few scattered facts in this posting that I agree with, but overall, this is another scare tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...hmmm...I'm going to send that along to my mom, for sure!

 

While it's true that, honestly, the government cares nothing for our health, I really don't think its as biased as they say it is. The article makes a great case for testicular vs. breast cancer in terms of cutting bits and pieces of yourself out, but, it fails to say that even men are subjected to chemotherapy and all the same treatments that women receive. Men are also uneducated about the steps they could take to prevent cancer in themselves.

 

The article makes a good case for using homeopathic treatments first, and I've always thought that should be a persons first stop when trying to find a 'fix' or 'cure', but what about when those treatments fail? Chemotherapy shrinks the size of tumors, which is important when it comes down to needing to extract a potentially harmful tumor; there are guidelines limiting surgeons to the size of a tumor they can remove. Is chemotherapy needed in all cases, no, but in some cases (the other 2% or so that don't benefit from natural cures) it's probably critically important to shrink the tumor size to remove the tissue.

 

Last but not least, the Nazi reference was a bit over-board. Yes, the government is intentionally misleading us, but how is that different from any other day? The FDA, USDA, AMA, all government controlled offices that are supposed to serve the public health lie to us about the safety of the things we eat, not just meat but even right down to the vegetables and so called 'USDA Certified Organic' foods. Can they be likened to Nazis? No, not at all; if anything they're what we've always feared, Big Brother, and though He may not be watching He is misleading us and telling us what to eat. (Case and point, those new HFCS ads on TV)

 

So in all, it was a great article and there were some interesting kernels in there that I'll for sure take away with me. Overall though, it looked like a huge conspiracy theory gone awry. No doubt there's a cancer industry, and no doubt they money you give them doesn't do anything, but the crazy in that article was overwhleming for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...hmmm...I'm going to send that along to my mom, for sure!

 

While it's true that, honestly, the government cares nothing for our health, I really don't think its as biased as they say it is. The article makes a great case for testicular vs. breast cancer in terms of cutting bits and pieces of yourself out, but, it fails to say that even men are subjected to chemotherapy and all the same treatments that women receive. Men are also uneducated about the steps they could take to prevent cancer in themselves.

 

The article makes a good case for using homeopathic treatments first, and I've always thought that should be a persons first stop when trying to find a 'fix' or 'cure', but what about when those treatments fail? Chemotherapy shrinks the size of tumors, which is important when it comes down to needing to extract a potentially harmful tumor; there are guidelines limiting surgeons to the size of a tumor they can remove. Is chemotherapy needed in all cases, no, but in some cases (the other 2% or so that don't benefit from natural cures) it's probably critically important to shrink the tumor size to remove the tissue.

 

Last but not least, the Nazi reference was a bit over-board. Yes, the government is intentionally misleading us, but how is that different from any other day? The FDA, USDA, AMA, all government controlled offices that are supposed to serve the public health lie to us about the safety of the things we eat, not just meat but even right down to the vegetables and so called 'USDA Certified Organic' foods. Can they be likened to Nazis? No, not at all; if anything they're what we've always feared, Big Brother, and though He may not be watching He is misleading us and telling us what to eat. (Case and point, those new HFCS ads on TV)

 

So in all, it was a great article and there were some interesting kernels in there that I'll for sure take away with me. Overall though, it looked like a huge conspiracy theory gone awry. No doubt there's a cancer industry, and no doubt they money you give them doesn't do anything, but the crazy in that article was overwhleming for me.

 

 

Well said DM...the issues I have with this article posted is how it is worded. It is used as a scare tactic.

 

Yes the pink ribbon campaign (which I am a strong supporter of by the way) offers wigs to breast cancer women who have lost their hair due to chemo treatments. They ALSO offer counseling, family support, alternative therapy as well. They are also doing research to see how this can be prevented, as well as EDUCATION FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMAN (men also get breast cancer, though not as high as women).

 

While diet is a factor in preventing breast cancer, those with mothers/aunts/etc. with a famiy history of cancer/breast cancer ARE at a higher risk for breast cancer, even those with cycstic breast (like myself, I have cycstic breast).

 

The mammogram machine is painful no matter what and it doesn't always show cancer. There is another sonic form of breast exam that many alternative health centers off, BUT the cost is around the $300 range (though it is painless and in many cases, better at showing just what the hell is going on inside the breasts). But guess what...in many cases, THEY DON'T ACCEPT HEALTH INSURANCE. So many of us are simply left with the only result of mammograms.

 

I can go on, but as I have already stated before, I take some very serious issues with his form of scare tactic, so therefore will simply be quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...hmmm...I'm going to send that along to my mom, for sure!

 

While it's true that, honestly, the government cares nothing for our health, I really don't think its as biased as they say it is. The article makes a great case for testicular vs. breast cancer in terms of cutting bits and pieces of yourself out, but, it fails to say that even men are subjected to chemotherapy and all the same treatments that women receive. Men are also uneducated about the steps they could take to prevent cancer in themselves.

 

The article makes a good case for using homeopathic treatments first, and I've always thought that should be a persons first stop when trying to find a 'fix' or 'cure', but what about when those treatments fail? Chemotherapy shrinks the size of tumors, which is important when it comes down to needing to extract a potentially harmful tumor; there are guidelines limiting surgeons to the size of a tumor they can remove. Is chemotherapy needed in all cases, no, but in some cases (the other 2% or so that don't benefit from natural cures) it's probably critically important to shrink the tumor size to remove the tissue.

 

Last but not least, the Nazi reference was a bit over-board. Yes, the government is intentionally misleading us, but how is that different from any other day? The FDA, USDA, AMA, all government controlled offices that are supposed to serve the public health lie to us about the safety of the things we eat, not just meat but even right down to the vegetables and so called 'USDA Certified Organic' foods. Can they be likened to Nazis? No, not at all; if anything they're what we've always feared, Big Brother, and though He may not be watching He is misleading us and telling us what to eat. (Case and point, those new HFCS ads on TV)

 

So in all, it was a great article and there were some interesting kernels in there that I'll for sure take away with me. Overall though, it looked like a huge conspiracy theory gone awry. No doubt there's a cancer industry, and no doubt they money you give them doesn't do anything, but the crazy in that article was overwhleming for me.

Well stated DM and Anjel! I have many problems with the wording of this article and see it as another huge scare tactic itself. I too am a huge supporter of the pink ribbon campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention here that things such as powerplants, powerlines, water treatment plants, chemical treatment plants, etc. are also well known factors of all forms of cancer, especially breast cancer in women.

 

So on the fact that this article stated that diet alone was a factor in breast cancer was dead wrong and studies have proven this over and over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russell, I take some very serious issues with this article overall.

 

There are a few scattered facts in this posting that I agree with, but overall, this is another scare tactic.

 

AnjelWolf, What scare tactics, who is the author trying to scare? please explain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...hmmm...I'm going to send that along to my mom, for sure!

 

While it's true that, honestly, the government cares nothing for our health, I really don't think its as biased as they say it is. The article makes a great case for testicular vs. breast cancer in terms of cutting bits and pieces of yourself out, but, it fails to say that even men are subjected to chemotherapy and all the same treatments that women receive. Men are also uneducated about the steps they could take to prevent cancer in themselves.

 

The article makes a good case for using homeopathic treatments first, and I've always thought that should be a persons first stop when trying to find a 'fix' or 'cure', but what about when those treatments fail? Chemotherapy shrinks the size of tumors, which is important when it comes down to needing to extract a potentially harmful tumor; there are guidelines limiting surgeons to the size of a tumor they can remove. Is chemotherapy needed in all cases, no, but in some cases (the other 2% or so that don't benefit from natural cures) it's probably critically important to shrink the tumor size to remove the tissue.

 

Last but not least, the Nazi reference was a bit over-board. Yes, the government is intentionally misleading us, but how is that different from any other day? The FDA, USDA, AMA, all government controlled offices that are supposed to serve the public health lie to us about the safety of the things we eat, not just meat but even right down to the vegetables and so called 'USDA Certified Organic' foods. Can they be likened to Nazis? No, not at all; if anything they're what we've always feared, Big Brother, and though He may not be watching He is misleading us and telling us what to eat. (Case and point, those new HFCS ads on TV)

 

So in all, it was a great article and there were some interesting kernels in there that I'll for sure take away with me. Overall though, it looked like a huge conspiracy theory gone awry. No doubt there's a cancer industry, and no doubt they money you give them doesn't do anything, but the crazy in that article was overwhleming for me.

 

Hi DeviousMousie, I think that you are missing the point, this is not an argument over the intelligence or knowledge of men and women. it simply points out that women are encouraged/pressured into preventative mastectomies, while men are never told to castrate as a prevention. Look at what happened to Christina Applegate. If you need further proof, how about from a real Breast Cancer Victim http://www.naturalnews.com/024496.html.

 

As for the Nazi thing; well 24 managers of IG Farben, Interessengemeinschaft Farben, (Association of Common Interests), became a powerful cartel of German chemical and pharmaceutical companies such as Bayer (the aspirin manufacturer), BASF, AGFA, and Hoechst (now known as Aventis.) were war criminals, you can check the facts for yourself.

 

I hope this clears things up for you. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russell, I take some very serious issues with this article overall.

 

There are a few scattered facts in this posting that I agree with, but overall, this is another scare tactic.

 

Agreed. It can scare some people from getting any treatment at all, thinking the whole medical community is bunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article makes a good case for using homeopathic treatments first, and I've always thought that should be a persons first stop when trying to find a 'fix' or 'cure', but what about when those treatments fail? Chemotherapy shrinks the size of tumors, which is important when it comes down to needing to extract a potentially harmful tumor; there are guidelines limiting surgeons to the size of a tumor they can remove. Is chemotherapy needed in all cases, no, but in some cases (the other 2% or so that don't benefit from natural cures) it's probably critically important to shrink the tumor size to remove the tissue.

 

This article is advocating a change in lifestyle with natural whole foods, as well as any supplements that one wishes to take (if any) in order to "prevent" the disease in the first place, it is not saying use this method alone to "treat" the disease. By the way; Chemotherapy destroys the immune system, the very thing that is needed to fight disease in the first place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO; I think that we should not be concerned with it's language/style. The author is very passionate about his beliefs, and so tends to be a bit overbearing, however it's the content and facts that matter. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth
This article is advocating a change in lifestyle with natural whole foods, as well as any supplements that one wishes to take (if any) in order to "prevent" the disease in the first place, it is not saying use this method alone to "treat" the disease. By the way; Chemotherapy destroys the immune system, the very thing that is needed to fight disease in the first place!

 

I agree that it is, but it is an extremely extremist point of view. What this article tries to state is that chemotherapy doesn't do ANY good in ANY women or for ANY cancer. I can tell you that there have been SOME successes with chemotherapy, and that this medical field, like all are still evolving.

 

There is counseling and information worldwide and at every hospital/medical center on breast cancer, that does give valuable information on how to prevent it (and some actually have alternative methods which is what this article is talking about). I agree that this article is another scare tactic and is just hippocratic to even say that the breast cancer industry is a scare tactic.

 

There were some valid points though - many things OTHER than cancer can be prevented with good diet, as well as treatment for bi-polar and autism. (this is proven, and this information is also readily available to the public)

 

This article is very wrong on the subject of sunlight. What it doesn't say is that a healthy dose of sunlight is good, while too much sunlight can cause cancer itself. That is a fact - there are skin cancers caused by sun light.

 

I'd also like to point out that everything has some sort of cancer causing property in it. Hell, when we burn firewood or incense we breathe in cancerous toxins.

 

I agree again that this article is a scare tactic because it fails to state this, and chooses to say that only natural medicine is bad and modern medicine is good. I disagree entirely. There are many different herbal supplements and vitamins that can cause an unhealthy imbalance in your brain chemistry or organs. Now, I personally am for natural medicine, but it's a matter of knowledge of who you are as to what you're taking.

 

Also, I'd like to note that when you have cancerous toxins going through your body, your immune system is already being destroyed. I'm still lost as to where this article portrays it's view of treatment for cancer. All I read was how to prevent and then a good bashing of the only treatments we have that has SOME statistics of helping those who already have cancers. I'll go back and re-read it though.. maybe I missed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth
IMHO; I think that we should not be concerned with it's language/style. The author is very passionate about his beliefs, and so tends to be a bit overbearing, however it's the content and facts that matter. :)

 

Some of these facts are false. Chemotherapy DOES have some statistics of succeeding in treatment. This article says it has helped none at 0%.

 

Among some of the other accusations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth

Myth #8: There is no cure for breast cancer

 

The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for breast cancer available right now

 

Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for cancer: Vitamin D' date=' cat's claw herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal mushrooms, spirulina, cruciferous vegetables, green tea, graviola herbs, Chinese medicinal herbs, oxygen therapy, alkalizing water therapies and much more.

 

All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by the FDA and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America.[/quote']

 

.. what exactly is the FDA and FTC suppressing? .. if they were suppressing this information how would 'just a few hours of research' turn up with results? And these substances are readily available.. so I'm still lost on the authors point.

 

His other point 'Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America.'.. that's bull shit. Straight up maggot infested runny bull shit. You can go to the green market or the local CVS pharmacy and it'll say on the bottle or isle 'promotes healthy cell production'. It may not say 'cancer' but if you know what cancer is and how it forms you should be able to put two and two together.

 

There are doctors who specialize in natural and alternative medicines and they could list all the different remedies that could POSSIBLY prevent cancer cells. This information is not suppressed.

 

edit -- I'd also like to point out there IS NOT a proven cure - natural or chemical - for any cancer as of yet. I'll repeat - Natural or chemical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO; I think that we should not be concerned with it's language/style. The author is very passionate about his beliefs, and so tends to be a bit overbearing, however it's the content and facts that matter. :)

 

This is where you and I disagree. The wording is a main issue here Russell. Scare tactics are scare tactics. They are meant to frighten the general public into thinking one thing and laying blame on something that is not the root of another's opinion.

 

Being passionate about one's beliefs is a good thing...using scare tactics and being overbearing about the same beliefs turns into propaganda and deception.

 

I stil stand by my original statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it is, but it is an extremely extremist point of view. What this article tries to state is that chemotherapy doesn't do ANY good in ANY women or for ANY cancer. I can tell you that there have been SOME successes with chemotherapy, and that this medical field, like all are still evolving.

 

There is counseling and information worldwide and at every hospital/medical center on breast cancer, that does give valuable information on how to prevent it (and some actually have alternative methods which is what this article is talking about). I agree that this article is another scare tactic and is just hippocratic to even say that the breast cancer industry is a scare tactic.

 

There were some valid points though - many things OTHER than cancer can be prevented with good diet, as well as treatment for bi-polar and autism. (this is proven, and this information is also readily available to the public)

 

This article is very wrong on the subject of sunlight. What it doesn't say is that a healthy dose of sunlight is good, while too much sunlight can cause cancer itself. That is a fact - there are skin cancers caused by sun light.

 

I'd also like to point out that everything has some sort of cancer causing property in it. Hell, when we burn firewood or incense we breathe in cancerous toxins.

 

I agree again that this article is a scare tactic because it fails to state this, and chooses to say that only natural medicine is bad and modern medicine is good. I disagree entirely. There are many different herbal supplements and vitamins that can cause an unhealthy imbalance in your brain chemistry or organs. Now, I personally am for natural medicine, but it's a matter of knowledge of who you are as to what you're taking.

 

Also, I'd like to note that when you have cancerous toxins going through your body, your immune system is already being destroyed. I'm still lost as to where this article portrays it's view of treatment for cancer. All I read was how to prevent and then a good bashing of the only treatments we have that has SOME statistics of helping those who already have cancers. I'll go back and re-read it though.. maybe I missed it.

 

Landieth, the article is supposed to provoke thought, and as stated; it is not intended to treat or prevent disease, it simply provides food for thought (as my grandmother use to say Fore Warned is Fore Armed) having all the facts will allow someone to make informed choices, for example we need to be sensible about sun exposure, the article mentions sun exposure, but does not give advice as to the lenth of exposure (see above), many people are afraid of the sun due to modern medicine, and yet are advised to apply toxic chemicals (regular sun screen) to their skin! by the way you can check your own vitamin D levels with a simple blood test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth
Landieth, the article is supposed to provoke thought, and as stated; it is not intended to treat or prevent disease, it simply provides food for thought (as my grandmother use to say Fore Warned is Fore Armed) having all the facts will allow someone to make informed choices, for example we need to be sensible about sun exposure, the article mentions sun exposure, but does not give advice as to the lenth of exposure (see above), many people are afraid of the sun due to modern medicine, and yet are advised to apply toxic chemicals (regular sun screen) to their skin! by the way you can check your own vitamin D levels with a simple blood test.

 

I do agree that one should be well versed in what you're putting on and in your body, but I disagree this article is all facts. :)

 

But as for this being food for thought.. It's the same thing I stated above - you should be well versed in what you're putting on and in your body (and I'd like to add your thoughts too). Which is why doing your own research about an articles 'facts', especially this one would be in a person's best interests.

Edited by Landieth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article is advocating a change in lifestyle with natural whole foods, as well as any supplements that one wishes to take (if any) in order to "prevent" the disease in the first place, it is not saying use this method alone to "treat" the disease. By the way; Chemotherapy destroys the immune system, the very thing that is needed to fight disease in the first place!

 

 

Russell changing one's lifestyle with healthy natural foods is always a good thing...but it alone will NOT prevent/reverse/defeat any and/or all forms of cancer (or any disease for that matter).

 

YES Chemo tackles the immune system...that's why it is backed up with vitamins and other healthy related foods as well. NOBODY said Chemo was the end all here.

 

Example...when someone takes anti-botics for an infection...they should ALSO take PRO-BOTICS as well to help replace the botics in our systems.

 

He states that a poor diet is the reason why women get breast cancer. AND if they were to eat natural foods, they would NOT get breast cancer.

 

He FAILS to examine everything (living situations/family history/past & present health issues/etc.) that factor into someone being a higher risk factor for breast cancer.

 

Bottom line...this guy needed a "go to" guy and he point-pointed the pink ribbon campaign and Chemo.

 

THAT is ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where you and I disagree. The wording is a main issue here Russell. Scare tactics are scare tactics. They are meant to frighten the general public into thinking one thing and laying blame on something that is not the root of another's opinion.

 

Being passionate about one's beliefs is a good thing...using scare tactics and being overbearing about the same beliefs turns into propaganda and deception.

 

I stil stand by my original statement.

 

Ok but how is telling someone to get good wholesome nutrition as a prevention for disease, using scare tactics. A person with cancer is already scared, and everyone else is scared of getting cancer? I still don't understand what you mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russell changing one's lifestyle with healthy natural foods is always a good thing...but it alone will NOT prevent/reverse/defeat any and/or all forms of cancer (or any disease for that matter).

 

YES Chemo tackles the immune system...that's why it is backed up with vitamins and other healthy related foods as well. NOBODY said Chemo was the end all here.

 

Example...when someone takes anti-botics for an infection...they should ALSO take PRO-BOTICS as well to help replace the botics in our systems.

 

He states that a poor diet is the reason why women get breast cancer. AND if they were to eat natural foods, they would NOT get breast cancer.

 

He FAILS to examine everything (living situations/family history/past & present health issues/etc.) that factor into someone being a higher risk factor for breast cancer.

 

Bottom line...this guy needed a "go to" guy and he point-pointed the pink ribbon campaign and Chemo.

 

THAT is ignorance.

 

He is not saying it will prevent/reverse/defeat any and/or all forms of cancer!.

 

No amount of "vitamins and other healthy related foods" will restore a Chemo destroyed immune system, the drugs are designed to suppress under any and all circumstances.

 

Sorry I don't understand what you mean by the following statement "Bottom line...this guy needed a "go to" guy and he point-pointed the pink ribbon campaign and Chemo."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is not saying it will prevent/reverse/defeat any and/or all forms of cancer!.

"

 

Keyword you wrote is "prevent" I think you need to go back & reread what the guy wrote as it did say a proper diet WOULD prevent breast cancer.

 

Some of it may be facts but I personally have people in my family who had cancer. Some died some lived. This guy says a proper diet would save them & not the chemo or radiation.

 

I agree this is a scare tactic towards women. The man seems to have put to much of his opinion in more then he did facts.

 

This is not a fact based article in my IMO & from research & personal experience thru family members. I personally wouldnt call this person passionate but more overzealous.

 

Anjel & others have made very good points.

 

Sapphire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bean Sprite

Bottom line here, I am a 2x survivor of cancer, although not breast cancer, but cervical cancer, and I don't mean the one caused by the human papilovirus, but one caused by the environment.

I grew up eating only whole, oraganicaly grown foods and was raised without western medicine, so if whole foods should have saved me, then myself and a whole slew of people I grew up with should have never gotten cancer of any form.

Medicine saved me. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy saved me the first time. An experimental proceedure called genetherapy saved me the second time. Love from strangers I never met before, fighting the same fight and relief from alternative medicine made my days more berable. I was 25 when I was first diagnosed, 27 when I was given a death sentence, but I am alive now, so the treatments do work and I am greatfull, even if I did have permanent damage to my bones, lost all of my hair (from every imaginable place), my dignity, my child bearing years, and even my brain cells.

The point is; everything in life comes with a price tag, and sometimes you have to lose something to gain much more, but in the end it is worth the fight, every minute of it, and I am fortunate to the cancer centers that are privately funded and not, for the support that my familly and I were given, because ultimately my will to live was much stronger with the support to fight this disease caused by everything we take for granted and use everyday (hair spray, perfume, deodorant, water, car exhaust, pesticides, air, artificial colors, paint, food preservatives, additives, whiteners, softeners, aerosols, air fresheners, hormones, birth control, latex, antifreeze, household cleaners, toiletries, medications, building materials, etc.), we are all at risk and nobody lives forever, but I have yet another chance to see my baby girl grow up and be a woman, so, the person who wrote the original article needs to get off of their high follutine soap box, remove the coffee enema, and get a grip, then get a life, start living it and quit waisting my time with their bull shit propaganda.

The world is corrupt. Companies will make their buck one way or another, even at the expense of a life. Deal with it and get on with life and embrace the path. It's a lot less miserable of a life to live.

I have been in remission for 4 years strong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth
Ok but how is telling someone to get good wholesome nutrition as a prevention for disease, using scare tactics. A person with cancer is already scared, and everyone else is scared of getting cancer? I still don't understand what you mean?

 

A scare tactic is views put in a way that makes that view the 'right' view by using social factors the targeted people know and twisting the facts around that scare the public away from them.

 

That's what this article does. It twists the facts around (and it looks like it's hooked you up into it) by titling the author's views on chemotherapy and the medical field behind breast cancer as 'facts'. He's thrown in percentages and statistics that are not correct, but he makes it appear that he is well researched. Bottom line, he isn't, and he's trying to make people believe the same thing he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Landieth
Bottom line here, I am a 2x survivor of cancer, although not breast cancer, but cervical cancer, and I don't mean the one caused by the human papilovirus, but one caused by the environment.

I grew up eating only whole, oraganicaly grown foods and was raised without western medicine, so if whole foods should have saved me, then myself and a whole slew of people I grew up with should have never gotten cancer of any form.

Medicine saved me. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy saved me the first time. An experimental proceedure called genetherapy saved me the second time. Love from strangers I never met before, fighting the same fight and relief from alternative medicine made my days more berable. I was 25 when I was first diagnosed, 27 when I was given a death sentence, but I am alive now, so the treatments do work and I am greatfull, even if I did have permanent damage to my bones, lost all of my hair (from every imaginable place), my dignity, my child bearing years, and even my brain cells.

The point is; everything in life comes with a price tag, and sometimes you have to lose something to gain much more, but in the end it is worth the fight, every minute of it, and I am fortunate to the cancer centers that are privately funded and not, for the support that my familly and I were given, because ultimately my will to live was much stronger with the support to fight this disease caused by everything we take for granted and use everyday (hair spray, perfume, deodorant, water, car exhaust, pesticides, air, artificial colors, paint, food preservatives, additives, whiteners, softeners, aerosols, air fresheners, hormones, birth control, latex, antifreeze, household cleaners, toiletries, medications, building materials, etc.), we are all at risk and nobody lives forever, but I have yet another chance to see my baby girl grow up and be a woman, so, the person who wrote the original article needs to get off of their high follutine soap box, remove the coffee enema, and get a grip, then get a life, start living it and quit waisting my time with their bull shit propaganda.

The world is corrupt. Companies will make their buck one way or another, even at the expense of a life. Deal with it and get on with life and embrace the path. It's a lot less miserable of a life to live.

I have been in remission for 4 years strong!

 

Very cool BS! :)

 

:big hugs!:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line here, I am a 2x survivor of cancer, although not breast cancer, but cervical cancer, and I don't mean the one caused by the human papilovirus, but one caused by the environment.

I grew up eating only whole, oraganicaly grown foods and was raised without western medicine, so if whole foods should have saved me, then myself and a whole slew of people I grew up with should have never gotten cancer of any form.

Medicine saved me. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy saved me the first time. An experimental proceedure called genetherapy saved me the second time. Love from strangers I never met before, fighting the same fight and relief from alternative medicine made my days more berable. I was 25 when I was first diagnosed, 27 when I was given a death sentence, but I am alive now, so the treatments do work and I am greatfull, even if I did have permanent damage to my bones, lost all of my hair (from every imaginable place), my dignity, my child bearing years, and even my brain cells.

The point is; everything in life comes with a price tag, and sometimes you have to lose something to gain much more, but in the end it is worth the fight, every minute of it, and I am fortunate to the cancer centers that are privately funded and not, for the support that my familly and I were given, because ultimately my will to live was much stronger with the support to fight this disease caused by everything we take for granted and use everyday (hair spray, perfume, deodorant, water, car exhaust, pesticides, air, artificial colors, paint, food preservatives, additives, whiteners, softeners, aerosols, air fresheners, hormones, birth control, latex, antifreeze, household cleaners, toiletries, medications, building materials, etc.), we are all at risk and nobody lives forever, but I have yet another chance to see my baby girl grow up and be a woman, so, the person who wrote the original article needs to get off of their high follutine soap box, remove the coffee enema, and get a grip, then get a life, start living it and quit waisting my time with their bull shit propaganda.

The world is corrupt. Companies will make their buck one way or another, even at the expense of a life. Deal with it and get on with life and embrace the path. It's a lot less miserable of a life to live.

I have been in remission for 4 years strong!

 

 

Bean I give you high appreciation. My oldest sister went thru cervical cancer a couple of years ago & it left her bones bad to the point she had to have therapy to relearn walking straight. She sometimes in a wheelchair or cane & looks like she will never work again, she was a work a holic. She had a recent scare a couple months back that it came back but it didnt. I commend you for being a strong woman.

 

Sapphire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...